---
title: "Case for Continued Bull Market in Oil Prices: Declines in Conventional Non-OPEC Production Likely to Accelerate"
description: Conventional non-OPEC oil production is decreasing with no major new discoveries in sight. What does that mean for oil prices?
image: https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Blog%20Images/Blog-116-LinkedIn.png
---

[![GoRozen logo](https://blog.gorozen.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Gorozen_July2023/images/629a25c15755c930be0d624f_GoRozen-logo-horizontal-web.png?width=444&height=79&name=629a25c15755c930be0d624f_GoRozen-logo-horizontal-web.png "GoRozen logo")](https://www.gorozen.com/)

- FIRM

    - [HOME](https://www.gorozen.com/)
    - [ABOUT](https://www.gorozen.com/about)
    - [TEAM](https://www.gorozen.com/team)
- CONTENT

    - [COMMENTARIES](https://www.gorozen.com/commentaries)
    - [BLOG](https://blog.gorozen.com/blog)
    - [PODCASTS](https://www.gorozen.com/podcasts)
- HOW TO INVEST

    - [MUTUAL FUND](https://www.gorozen.com/gr-funds)
- [CONFERENCE](https://conference.gorozen.com/)
- [CONTACT](https://www.gorozen.com/contact)

[access latest research](https://www.gorozen.com/commentaries)

![Banner](https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Gorozen_July2023/images/post-image.webp)

## Case for Continued Bull Market in Oil Prices: Declines in Conventional Non-OPEC Production Likely to Accelerate

09/13/2018

*“In the second half of this decade total capital expenditures by the large oil and gas groups is projected to fall almost fifty percent to $443.5 bn from $875.1 bn according to Rystad Energy...”*

*“...the industry has largely abandoned new investment in the type of mega-projects, from Arctic exploration to Canadian oil sands, which were once its forte.”*

 

 

*“Oil producers face their ‘life or death’ question,” Financial Times 6/20/18*

*“‘Big Oil is sowing the seeds for a ‘super-spike’ in crude prices above $150,’ Bernstein warns.” CNBC 7/6/2018*

 

As recently as 2017, most market commentators believed the world was “awash” in oil. In reality, this was only true during a brief time between 2014 and 2016. Non-OPEC supply grew by 2.5 mm barrels per day (b/d) in 2014 and Saudi Arabia responded by boosting their production at the November 2014 OPEC meeting, leading to an OPEC market share war and plunging oil prices.

 

![Untitled-9.07842349](https://blog.gorozen.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Goehringrozencwajg%20November2017%20/image/Untitled-9.07842349.png?width=2399&name=Untitled-9.07842349.png)

 

Since then, incredibly strong demand growth, combined with OPEC’s decision to curtail production at the end of 2016, has once again thrown global oil markets back into severe deficit. **We believe that one aspect in particular - the decline in conventional non-OPEC production (largely ignored by industry analysts) - will now become an issue that grabs center stage.**

## Why has all the attention been on shale oil?

 

The success of shale oil in the United States has been one of the most dramatic advancements in energy production since the discovery of the Saudi mega-fields after World War II. Since 2010, US shale oil production has grown by over five million barrels per day – by far the largest single source of growth in the world. Having been an early investor in the US shale plays, we have written for over a decade about the incredible potential unlocked by the combination of horizontal drilling and hydrological fracture stimulation (first in the natural gas shales and later in the oil shales). However, while the world has been focused entirely on shale oil production, something very important has taken place in the rest of the non-OPEC world that few people have noticed…

 

> ## Since 2010, *conventional* non-OPEC crude oil production has declined substantially.

 

This is critically important because, even after the meteoric rise of shale production over the last eight years, two out of every three non-OPEC barrels still come from conventional sources. While the analytic community has been fixated solely on the shale plays, 65% of non-OPEC production has been quietly developing a severe depletion problem that we anticipate will only get worse.

 

> *“Even after the meteoric rise of shale production over the last eight years, two out of every three non-OPEC barrels still come from conventional sources.”*

  

Between 2010 and 2018 we calculate total non-OPEC liquids production has grown by almost 10 mm b/d, but nearly 75% of this production increase came from US shales.  Conventional oil production decreased, as illustrated in the table below:

![Blog-116-Table](https://blog.gorozen.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Blog%20Images/Blog-116-Table.png?width=1200&name=Blog-116-Table.png)

Starting ten years ago, the industry faced a dearth of new mega-projects. Several years of high oil prices were not able to overcome this challenge and, as a result, new discoveries have plummeted. Making matters worse, low oil prices since late 2014 have led many oil companies to abandon what new mega-projects they did have and defer maintenance capital on their existing fields. We believe that all of these forces have combined and will result in material conventional non-OPEC disappointments going forward.

 

![Arctic-Oil-Discovery](https://blog.gorozen.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Blog%20Images/Arctic-Oil-Discovery.png?width=600&name=Arctic-Oil-Discovery.png)

 

The collapse in global discoveries of conventional oil is not new to us. It has been impressive and has received only passing comment by the financial press. In 2017 alone, the global oil industry discovered only four billion barrels while global consumption exceeded 35 billion barrels, leaving an impressive 30bn barrel gap between discoveries and demand. Over the last five years the numbers have been equally imbalanced. Since 2012, we estimate global oil consumption exceeded new conventional oil discoveries by a total of 210 bn barrels.

 

Investors consider the drop in conventional non-OPEC production to be immaterial given the surge in US shale oil production. However, our analysis suggests investors are completely underestimating the future impact of declining conventional non-OPEC production - production that still represents 45% of world supply.

 

*This blog is part of a series "The Case for Continued Bull Market in Oil Prices".  To read part 1 please [click here](https://blog.gorozen.com/blog/case-for-continued-bull-market-in-oil-prices-low-inventories-and-strengthening-demand), and to read part 3 in this series, [please click here](Case%20for%20Continued%20Bull%20Market%20in%20Oil%20Prices:%20U.S.%20Shale%20Oil%20Production%20is%20Poised%20to%20Falter).*

 

[![Goehring & Rozencwajg Q2 2018 Commentary](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/4043042/83c9de66-65d0-43d4-95c0-59c8a610f7ef.png)](https://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/4043042/83c9de66-65d0-43d4-95c0-59c8a610f7ef)

 

[Back](https://blog.gorozen.com/blog)

### Stay informed with Natural Resource Market Insights

### Recent Posts

Goehring & Rozencwajg Associates, LLC. The information provided on this website is intended to provide the investor with an introduction to Goehring & Rozencwajg Associates, LLC. Nothing on this website should be construed as a solicitation offer, or recommendation to buy or sell any security or as an offer to provide advisory services. Information on this website is intended only for United States citizens and residents. Nothing contained on this website constitutes investment, legal, tax, or other advice nor should be relied upon in making an investment or other decision. Investors should always obtain and read an up-to-date investment services description or prospectus before deciding whether to appoint an investment advisor or to invest in a fund.

This material may include estimates, outlooks, projections and other “forward-looking statements.” Due to a variety of factors, actual events or market behavior may differ significantly from any views expressed. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments concentrated in natural resources involve a higher degree of risk than more diversified strategies. **Past performance is no guarantee of future results.**

Investment process, strategies, philosophies, portfolio composition and allocations, security selection criteria and other parameters are current as of the date indicated and are subject to change without prior notice.

Neither rankings nor recognitions by unaffiliated rating services, publications, media, or other organizations, nor the achievement of any professional designation, certification, degree, or license, membership in any professional organization, or any amount of prior experience or success, should be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that the client will experience a certain level of results if the investment professional or the investment professional’s firm is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. A fee was not paid by either the investment professional or the investment professional’s firm to receive the ranking. The ranking is based upon specific criteria and methodology (see ranking criteria/methodology-to the extent applicable). No ranking or recognition should be construed as an endorsement by any past or current client of the investment professional or the investment professional’s firm.

Certain links may let you leave the Adviser’s website. The linked websites are not under the control of the Adviser, and we are not responsible for the content of any linked website, or any link contained in a linked website, or any changes or updates to such websites. Adviser is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, investigation, verification or monitoring by us of such third-party website. Any references to outside data, opinions or content are listed for informational purposes only and have not been verified for accuracy by the Adviser.  Third-party views, opinions or forecasts do not necessarily reflect those of the Adviser or its employees.

Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for illustrative purposes only. Adviser's clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in theri portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.

- [ADV Part 3 - Form CRS](https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Compliance%20Files/Goehring%20%26%20Rozencwajg%20Associates%20CRS%20Form%20ADV%20Part%203.pdf)
- [Cookie Policy](https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Compliance%20Files/G%26R%20Cookie%20Policy.pdf)
- [Privacy Policy](https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Compliance%20Files/G%26R%20Website%20Privacy%20Policy.pdf)

Goehring & Rozencwajg Associates LLC © 2023

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "Goehring & Rozencwajg Team",
    "url" : "https://blog.gorozen.com/blog/author/goehring-rozencwajg-team"
  },
  "datePublished" : "2018-09-13T19:35:51.000Z",
  "headline" : "Case for Continued Bull Market in Oil Prices: Declines in Conventional Non-OPEC Production Likely to Accelerate",
  "image" : [ "https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Blog%20Images/Blog-116-LinkedIn.png" ],
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@id" : "https://blog.gorozen.com/blog/declines-in-conventional-non-opec-production-likely-to-accelerate",
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Logos/GoRozen-logo-web.png"
    },
    "name" : "Goehring & Rozencwajg"
  }
}
```