---
title: Declining Tier 1 Acreage and Slowing US Shale Oil Production
description: With both the Eagle Ford and Bakken shales quickly running out of Tier 1 acreage, will US shale oil production growth continue to slow? We believe well location is just as important as extraction technology and methodology.
image: https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Blog%20Images/2019-Blog-170-LinkedIn.png
---

[![GoRozen logo](https://blog.gorozen.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Gorozen_July2023/images/629a25c15755c930be0d624f_GoRozen-logo-horizontal-web.png?width=444&height=79&name=629a25c15755c930be0d624f_GoRozen-logo-horizontal-web.png "GoRozen logo")](https://www.gorozen.com/)

- FIRM

    - [HOME](https://www.gorozen.com/)
    - [ABOUT](https://www.gorozen.com/about)
    - [TEAM](https://www.gorozen.com/team)
- CONTENT

    - [COMMENTARIES](https://www.gorozen.com/commentaries)
    - [BLOG](https://blog.gorozen.com/blog)
    - [PODCASTS](https://www.gorozen.com/podcasts)
- HOW TO INVEST

    - [MUTUAL FUND](https://www.gorozen.com/gr-funds)
- [CONFERENCE](https://conference.gorozen.com/)
- [CONTACT](https://www.gorozen.com/contact)

[access latest research](https://www.gorozen.com/commentaries)

![Banner](https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Gorozen_July2023/images/post-image.webp)

## Declining Tier 1 Acreage and Slowing US Shale Oil Production

11/07/2019

What’s happening to US shale production? After growing by a torrid 145,000 b/d per month in 2018, shale production growth has ground to a screeching near halt. Since December, shale oil production has grown by only 50,000 b/d per month – a collapse of almost 65% versus 2018’s phenomenal rates. Despite this slowdown, most energy analysts are still hoping for strong shale production growth both this year and next. For example, Rystad Energy, the Norwegian-based energy consulting firm, still believes total US liquids production will surge by another 1.8 mm b/d in 2020. However, our research suggests these optimistic projections will be difficult if not impossible to achieve.

![fracking has its costs](https://blog.gorozen.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Blog%20Images/fracking%20has%20its%20costs.jpg?width=600&name=fracking%20has%20its%20costs.jpg)

*Image Source: [Forbes.com](https://www.forbes.com/sites/ucenergy/2018/02/20/fracking-has-its-costs-and-benefits-the-trick-is-balancing-them/#4f2f625519b4)*

 

In [past letters](http://gorozen.com/research/commentaries), we tried to put forward and emphasize the factors that drove improved shale productivity growth over the last five years, and we explained why robust US shale oil production growth of the past decade was rapidly nearing an inflection point.  

 

Conventional wisdom held that productivity gains were the result of operators drilling and completing larger and better wells (longer laterals, larger proppant loadings and greater fluid volumes).

 

 **However, our research pointed us in an entirely different direction.**

 

We believe the surge in drilling productivity over the last five years is less the result of how producers drilled their wells and more the result of where they drilled them. In particular, we believe the improved drilling productivity was the result of a practice known as “high-grading.”

 

High-grading is an age-old practice used in both the oil and gas industry as well as the mining industry, and it simply consists of selecting and drilling your most productive prospects first. Over the last five years, the E&P industry has shifted significantly away from drilling their less productive Tier 2 acreage in favor of drilling their more productive Tier 1 acreage. Since drilling a Tier 1 well is nearly 100% more productive than a Tier 2 well, the industry has created the illusion of ever-improving productivity growth by narrowing their focus to only their best prospects. If our research is correct, then future increases in shale drilling productivity will be more a function of continued “high-grading” and less a function of ever-changing drilling and completion techniques.  

 

Why is this so important? [In our Q2 2019 letter](http://gorozen.com/research/commentaries), we detailed the proprietary artificial neural network we built to analyze the acreage quality of the US shales. We concluded that both the Eagle Ford and Bakken shales were quickly running out of Tier 1 acreage and that production growth from these plays was set to significantly disappoint in the coming years.  We also concluded that while the Permian basin had more remaining Tier 1 inventory that the other two, it would also begin to experience the first signs of exhaustion sooner than most people expected. Now that the US shales have started slowing dramatically, we have turned to our artificial neural network to help shed light on the reasons why. 

 

To continue reading this analysis, download our latest full research piece, ***[What is Happening to US Shale Production?](https://info.gorozen.com/2019-3q-goehring-and-rozencwajg-commentary)***

 

***[![New call-to-action](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/4043042/7066f81a-9c41-4eca-8f11-aa7030727df0.png)](https://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/4043042/7066f81a-9c41-4eca-8f11-aa7030727df0)***

 

[Back](https://blog.gorozen.com/blog)

### Stay informed with Natural Resource Market Insights

### Recent Posts

Goehring & Rozencwajg Associates, LLC. The information provided on this website is intended to provide the investor with an introduction to Goehring & Rozencwajg Associates, LLC. Nothing on this website should be construed as a solicitation offer, or recommendation to buy or sell any security or as an offer to provide advisory services. Information on this website is intended only for United States citizens and residents. Nothing contained on this website constitutes investment, legal, tax, or other advice nor should be relied upon in making an investment or other decision. Investors should always obtain and read an up-to-date investment services description or prospectus before deciding whether to appoint an investment advisor or to invest in a fund.

This material may include estimates, outlooks, projections and other “forward-looking statements.” Due to a variety of factors, actual events or market behavior may differ significantly from any views expressed. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments concentrated in natural resources involve a higher degree of risk than more diversified strategies. **Past performance is no guarantee of future results.**

Investment process, strategies, philosophies, portfolio composition and allocations, security selection criteria and other parameters are current as of the date indicated and are subject to change without prior notice.

Neither rankings nor recognitions by unaffiliated rating services, publications, media, or other organizations, nor the achievement of any professional designation, certification, degree, or license, membership in any professional organization, or any amount of prior experience or success, should be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that the client will experience a certain level of results if the investment professional or the investment professional’s firm is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. A fee was not paid by either the investment professional or the investment professional’s firm to receive the ranking. The ranking is based upon specific criteria and methodology (see ranking criteria/methodology-to the extent applicable). No ranking or recognition should be construed as an endorsement by any past or current client of the investment professional or the investment professional’s firm.

Certain links may let you leave the Adviser’s website. The linked websites are not under the control of the Adviser, and we are not responsible for the content of any linked website, or any link contained in a linked website, or any changes or updates to such websites. Adviser is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, investigation, verification or monitoring by us of such third-party website. Any references to outside data, opinions or content are listed for informational purposes only and have not been verified for accuracy by the Adviser.  Third-party views, opinions or forecasts do not necessarily reflect those of the Adviser or its employees.

Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for illustrative purposes only. Adviser's clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in theri portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.

- [ADV Part 3 - Form CRS](https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Compliance%20Files/Goehring%20%26%20Rozencwajg%20Associates%20CRS%20Form%20ADV%20Part%203.pdf)
- [Cookie Policy](https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Compliance%20Files/G%26R%20Cookie%20Policy.pdf)
- [Privacy Policy](https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Compliance%20Files/G%26R%20Website%20Privacy%20Policy.pdf)

Goehring & Rozencwajg Associates LLC © 2023

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "Goehring & Rozencwajg Team",
    "url" : "https://blog.gorozen.com/blog/author/goehring-rozencwajg-team"
  },
  "dateModified" : "2019-11-07T22:14:35.050Z",
  "datePublished" : "2019-11-07T22:14:35.000Z",
  "headline" : "Declining Tier 1 Acreage and Slowing US Shale Oil Production",
  "image" : [ "https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Blog%20Images/2019-Blog-170-LinkedIn.png" ],
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@id" : "https://blog.gorozen.com/blog/declining-tier-1-acreage-and-slowing-us-shale-oil-production",
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://blog.gorozen.com/hubfs/Logos/GoRozen-logo-web.png"
    },
    "name" : "Goehring & Rozencwajg"
  }
}
```